Zillow, Fees, AI, and the New Rules of Agent Control

By Tim, Julie, Dan, Chris, Kacie and Orlando · July 10, 2026

🎧 We’re also on Apple Podcasts and Spotify!

Here’s the energy from this week’s Powerhouse Talk: Zillow is back in the crosshairs, buyers are suing over a $475 fee, Gen Z is showing up at open houses, AI is now touching everything from listing copy to loan timelines, and the agents who are going to win this next version of the market are the ones who stay clear, sharp, and in control.

This was one of those episodes that didn’t just feel like a news roundup. It felt like a field report from the edge of where the business is actually changing. Four segments, a lot of laughs, a few war stories, and one very clear takeaway: if you sell homes for a living, the next phase of this business will reward agents who disclose better, communicate better, and stop outsourcing the core parts of what make them valuable.

The first segment covered five headlines agents are fighting about right now, starting with a proposed class action against Compass over a $475 administrative fee that buyers say was not properly disclosed. The panel’s read on it was not really “Compass bad” so much as “every brokerage better clean this up,” because consumers are now looking at every fee on the settlement statement and asking harder questions than they used to.

Kacie’s contribution here was one of the strongest moments in the entire show. She pointed out that many agents are relying on transaction coordinators or admins to write offers and handle paperwork without fully understanding what is actually being disclosed in the contract and in the buyer brokerage agreement. Her point was simple and brutal: your contract is your sword. If you are not writing it, reviewing it, and understanding it, then you are giving away one of the highest-value parts of your job.

From there, the commission conversation got more interesting. Chris floated the idea that buyer-side compensation may not be falling the way many people assumed, in part because the listing side has adjusted and because market conditions still put upward pressure on commission when homes get harder to sell. Kacie pushed the conversation into what she is actually seeing in Florida, where some listing agents are withholding buyer-agent compensation details until after an offer is submitted, forcing buyers’ agents to guess, negotiate in the dark, and sometimes walk away when the numbers do not work.

Julie’s take was one of the more important strategic observations of the episode. She argued that the new system may be creating the opposite of what it was supposed to fix: more conflict, more dual agency, more buyer frustration, and more incentive for consumers to bypass a buyer’s agent altogether and go straight to the listing side or to open houses. Chris brought it back to the one principle that still survives every commission fight: do what is in the best interest of the client, keep your standards, and do not let emotional combat with another agent wreck the deal.

The segment closed on Zillow, and again the panel landed somewhere more practical than ideological. Chris made the case that whatever agents say publicly about cutting Zillow off, sellers still expect their property to be there because that is where so many consumers look first. Kacie agreed on the need for presence, but took a flamethrower to Zillow Showcase, calling it a scam and telling a story about sitting with a seller, clicking “request a tour” on a Showcase listing, and watching four agents call in despite the supposed exclusivity. That wasn’t just a rant. It was a killer listing appointment move and a reminder that agents should test every premium product before they pay for it.

The AI segment was the most tactical part of the show. Julie opened with the stat that 82% of agents now write listings with AI, up from 58% in 2024, but the panel quickly moved past the obvious point that AI use is rising and into the much more useful question: what are smart agents actually doing with it.

Kacie shared a deceptively advanced tactic. Before launching a listing, she studies comps that sold quickly and for strong prices, looks at the remarks that appear to have worked, and then uses AI to combine those successful phrases with the terms people are searching for across Google, ChatGPT, and social media. In other words, she is not using AI just to write faster. She is using it to reverse-engineer which language already converts in her market and then training the output around that.

That led directly into one of the biggest themes of the episode: old SEO is fading, and AI search is becoming the new game. Tim and Julie talked about using Claude to generate AI-optimized market FAQs, interactive website content, and Google Business Profile language that helps an agent show up when consumers ask AI who the top agent is in a specific area. The advice was refreshingly blunt: stop trying to outsmart the black box and start asking the models what they are looking for, then build the content they reward.

Chris added an important caution. He called out what he described as the “AI adoption lie,” meaning that near-total adoption does not necessarily translate into higher production. In every wave of technology, a few power users create outsized results, while everyone else spends too much time on what feels productive but is not. His bottom line was exactly right: anything that creates more efficiency is worth using, but not during the hours you should be talking to people. The money still comes from contacts and relationships, especially in a business where AI may increasingly own the first interaction but not the trusted one.

The conversation got even better when it turned philosophical. Dan said AI is now where he starts on almost everything, while Chris said he intentionally does not go there first because he does not want to lose his cognitive edge. Julie landed in the most balanced place: AI can absolutely become a crutch, but it can also help people think at a higher level when used as a research assistant, a pattern finder, or a way to challenge assumptions. That debate made the segment feel more honest than the usual “AI is amazing” content. The panel was not worshipping the tool. They were trying to decide how to use it without becoming lazy because of it.

This was the new segment, and it worked. The premise was simple: a century of combined deals, and the mistakes everyone would happily unmake if they could. Instead of pretending experience comes from perfect execution, the panel turned the conversation into a collection of painful, funny, and oddly useful lessons.

Chris told the story of being a new agent with a listing under contract and not communicating enough with the other side, until the seller got so frustrated he called both agents to his house and sat them down for a lecture. Embarrassing? Absolutely. But also the kind of lesson that permanently teaches what experienced agents already know: the deal often lives or dies in the quality of communication between agents, not just in the paperwork.

Julie’s story was one of those first-closing nightmares every experienced agent remembers. She showed up early, caffeine loaded, thinking she was prepared, only to discover at the table that no termite report had been ordered on an FHA transaction. The buyer’s agent calmly pulled her aside, called his termite guy, and saved the closing on the spot. No termites, deal saved, lifelong lesson installed.

Kacie’s story took a different path and was pure Kacie. She got into a frustrated conversation over strict city rules around open-house signage, asked out loud who makes such stupid policies, and was immediately informed by the man in front of her that he did. Not an HOA president, as the group joked, but city code enforcement himself. It was funny, but it also fit the segment’s larger point: some of the most valuable professional lessons come from the moments when your confidence outruns your information.

Underneath the headlines, this episode was about control. Control over disclosure. Control over how you present compensation. Control over whether Zillow owns the consumer relationship or merely rents access to it. Control over whether AI becomes a power tool or a substitute for thinking.

It was also about what parts of the business agents can no longer afford to treat casually. You cannot be vague about fees. You cannot let someone else handle contracts and still pretend you are mastering your craft. You cannot pay for platform products blindly and call it strategy. And you cannot ignore AI search while hoping your old SEO habits or past production will continue to speak for you.

There was another message running through the whole conversation, too: all roads still lead back to becoming the listing agent. Julie said it directly during the compensation discussion, and the rest of the show kept proving her point. Listings create leverage. Listings give you visibility. Listings are where media, open houses, seller trust, and long-term authority all stack on top of each other.

This was not a doom episode. It was a recalibration episode. Even the opening wins supported that. Kacie landed a $9.7 million listing through social media and pulled an offer out of an open house because she answered the call the previous agent never returned, while Julie and Tim celebrated finishing a book and Chris checked in with a mix of vacation energy and perspective.

That matters because it reinforces the actual thesis of the episode: the business is changing fast, but opportunity still belongs to the agent who shows up, sharpens up, and stays visible. The portals are noisier. The lawsuits are getting louder. AI is more powerful. The consumer is more skeptical. Good. That only makes professionalism more valuable.

— Tim, Julie, Dan, Chris, Kacie and Orlando
Hosts, Power House Talk

whylibertas.com/harris
whylibertas.com/dan
whylibertas.com/heller
whylibertas.com/kacie-anderson
whylibertas.com/orlando-montiel

The official PHT × Libertas merch store is now live — designed for agents, entrepreneurs, and leaders who believe in showing up with confidence, professionalism, and purpose.

This collection goes beyond merch. It represents the mindset behind the movement: leadership, consistency, and becoming the trusted voice in your market and community.

From premium apparel to everyday essentials, every piece is made to help you represent the brand both on and off the clock.

Every purchase helps support the growth of the PHT × Libertas community, future events, and ongoing content for agents nationwide.

Lead boldly. Represent the movement.

💬 Want your question featured on an upcoming episode? Reply to this email or DM us on Instagram— we might break it down next.

📩 Know an agent who should be in this room?
Forward them Power House Talk.